Efficiënte Python-code schrijven
Logan Thomas
Scientific Software Technical Trainer, Enthought
Berekent looptijd met de IPython magic-opdracht %timeit
Magic-opdrachten: uitbreidingen bovenop de normale Python-syntax
%lsmagicCode om te timen
import numpy as np
rand_nums = np.random.rand(1000)
Timen met %timeit
%timeit rand_nums = np.random.rand(1000)
8.61 µs ± 69.1 ns per loop (gem. ± std. dev. van 7 runs, 100000 loops elk)



Het aantal runs (-r) en/of loops (-n) instellen
# Aantal runs op 2 zetten (-r2)
# Aantal loops op 10 zetten (-n10)
%timeit -r2 -n10 rand_nums = np.random.rand(1000)
16.9 µs ± 5.14 µs per loop (gem. ± std. dev. van 2 runs, 10 loops elk)
Line magic (%timeit)
# Eén regel code
%timeit nums = [x for x in range(10)]
914 ns ± 7.33 ns per loop (gem. ± std. dev. van 7 runs, 1000000 loops elk)
Cell magic (%%timeit)
# Meerdere regels code
%%timeit
nums = []
for x in range(10):
nums.append(x)
1.17 µs ± 3.26 ns per loop (gem. ± std. dev. van 7 runs, 1000000 loops elk)
De uitvoer in een variabele opslaan (-o)
times = %timeit -o rand_nums = np.random.rand(1000)
8.69 µs ± 91.4 ns per loop (gem. ± std. dev. van 7 runs, 100000 loops elk)
times.timings
[8.697893059998023e-06,
8.651204760008113e-06,
8.634270530001232e-06,
8.66847825998775e-06,
8.619398139999247e-06,
8.902550710008654e-06,
8.633500570012985e-06]
times.best
8.619398139999247e-06
times.worst
8.902550710008654e-06
Python-datastructuren kun je maken met de formele naam
formal_list = list()
formal_dict = dict()
formal_tuple = tuple()
Python-datastructuren kun je maken met letterlijke syntax
literal_list = []
literal_dict = {}
literal_tuple = ()
f_time = %timeit -o formal_dict = dict()
145 ns ± 1.5 ns per loop (gem. ± std. dev. van 7 runs, 10000000 loops elk)
l_time = %timeit -o literal_dict = {}
93.3 ns ± 1.88 ns per loop (gem. ± std. dev. van 7 runs, 10000000 loops elk)
diff = (f_time.average - l_time.average) * (10**9)
print('l_time beter dan f_time met {} ns'.format(diff))
l_time beter dan f_time met 51.90819192857814 ns
%timeit formal_dict = dict()
145 ns ± 1.5 ns per loop (gem. ± std. dev. van 7 runs, 10000000 loops elk)
%timeit literal_dict = {}
93.3 ns ± 1.88 ns per loop (gem. ± std. dev. van 7 runs, 10000000 loops elk)
Efficiënte Python-code schrijven